Legal Opinion
Drakes Bay Oyster Company v. Sally Jewell
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 3, 2013No. 13-15227PublishedCited by 438 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
The opinion filed on September 3, 2013, appearing at 729 F.3d 967, is hereby amended. An amended opinion is filed concurrently with this order.
With these amendments, Judge McKeown voted to deny the petition for rehearing en banc and Judge Marbley so recommends. Judge Watford voted to grant the petition.
Amicus Curiae Catherine Rucker’s request for judicial notice in support of her brief opposing the petition for rehearing en banc is DENIED.
The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc and no judge has requested a vote on whether tp rehear the matter en banc. Fed.…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Nken v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Allapattah Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Alliance for Wild Rockies v. CottrellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by438 opinions
- Saravia v. SessionsDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2017
- State of California v. the Little Sisters of the PoorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- League of Wilderness Defenders/Blue Mountains Biodiversity Project v. ConnaughtonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Faour Fraihat v. US Imm. & Customs EnforcementCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
- Kelvin Hernandez Roman v. Chad WolfCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
433 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.