Burgin v. Hodge
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
THOMAS, 3.
The bill and proof were insufficient under the statute to quiet title to real estate. Code, § 5443; Davis v. Daniels, 204 Ala. 374, 85 South. 797. It is not averred and shown that complainants were in the peaceable possession of the land, actual or constructive, as distinguished from a disputed or “scrambling possession.” Foy v. Barr, 145 Ala. 244, 39 South. 578; Carr v. Moore, 203 Ala. 223, 82 South. 473.
The foundation of complainants’ claim or title to the land is upon an alleged mortgage, purporting to have been executed by George W. Burgin and others (not by his wife) to Nelson…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- McGuire v. Van PeltSupreme Court of Alabama · 1876
- Kennedy v. First National BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1894
- Fuller v. WhitlockSupreme Court of Alabama · 1892
- Ware v. BradfordSupreme Court of Alabama · 1841
- Clark v. SpencerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1883
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. EstesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
- Rice v. ParkSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
- Hobson v. RobertsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
- Miller v. WoodardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922
- Screws v. HeardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.