Legal Opinion

Miller v. Woodard

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 13, 1922No. 6 Div. 545PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.

The ipstant bill was to declare that a forfeiture existed in leases, and to remove a cloud from title because of the fact of such forfeiture, and for injunctive relief.

It is averred that on May 14, 1910, W. N. Miller executed and delivered to Charles D. Pantaze the instrument made a part of the bill as Exhibit A; that on February 21, 1914, W. N. Miller and W. M. Miller executed and delivered to H. G. Woodard the instrument in writing made a part of the bill as Exhibit B; that said Woodard had theretofore in some manner “become the owner of the Pantaze lease (Exhibit A) and of all rights under…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. McMillan v. AikenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
  2. Chastang v. ChastangSupreme Court of Alabama · 1904
  3. Crawford v. CarlisleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
  4. Hooper v. Bankhead & BankheadSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
  5. Shannon v. LongSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Phillips v. Sipsey Coal Mining Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  2. Opine Timber Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1975
  3. Hobson v. RobertsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
  4. Pizitz-Smolian Co-Operative Stores v. RandolphSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
  5. Screws v. HeardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API