Legal Opinion
Rice v. Park
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided March 26, 1931No. 8 Div. 253PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.
The hill was filed under the statute to quiet title. That pleading contained the required averments as to nonpendeney of suits for land, that the complainants were in peaceable possession, etc., under the statute, § 9905, Code, and the decisions. Cooper v. Brown & Sons Lumber Co., 214 Ala. 400, 108 So. 20; Buchmann Abstract & Inv. Co. v. Roberts, 213 Ala. 520, 105 So. 675; Burgin v. Hodge, 207 Ala. 315, 93 So. 27; Irwin v. Shoemaker, 205 Ala. 13, 88 So. 129; Davis v. Daniels, 204 Ala. 374, 85 So. 797; Gill v. More, 200 Ala. 511, 76 So. 453; Wood Lumber Co. v. Williams, 157 Ala. 73, 47 So.…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Smith T. v. BellSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
- Patch v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Crane v. Lessee of MorrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
- Blagge v. MilesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1841
- Funk v. EgglestonIllinois Supreme Court · 1879
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Perdue v. RobertsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1975
- United States v. The Merchants National Bank of Mobile, as Under the Will of Nettie F. Turner, DeceasedCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1958
- Rogers v. McLeskeySupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
- Wiley v. MurphreeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
- Watson v. BakerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.