Legal Opinion
Flowers v. EZPawn Oklahoma, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Oklahoma
Decided February 3, 2004No. 4:03-cv-00359PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
KERN, District Judge.
Before the Court is Defendants’ Objection to the Magistrate’s Recommendation on Motion to Remand and Motion to Compel Arbitration (# 27). Upon review of the record, the Court concludes the Report should be affirmed in all respects. All dispositive issues have been accorded a de novo review in compliance with FED. R. CIV. P.72 (b). 1
Discussion
The Court will not revisit all of the issues found in the Magistrate’s Report. However, some issues objected to by Defendants merit brief but additional discussion.
A. Diversity Jurisdiction
In their Objection, Defendants state…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Frank D. Gaus v. Miles, Inc., an Indiana CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
- Dennis Wayne Moore v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- In Re Community Bank of Northern VirginiaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
- Discover Bank v. VadenCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2007
- Slover v. Equitable Variable Life InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2006
- Bankwest, Inc. v. BakerDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2004
- Meade v. Avant of Colo., LLCDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2018
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.