Legal Opinion
Meade v. Avant of Colo., LLC
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided March 1, 2018No. Civil Action No. 17–cv–0620–WJM–STVPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
(ECF No. 62 at 2-4 (citations as in original; footnote omitted).)
III. LEGAL STANDARDS
A. Review Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b)
When a magistrate judge issues a recommendation on a dispositive matter, Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b)(3) requires that the district judge "determine de novo any part of the magistrate judge's [recommendation] that has been properly objected to." An objection to a recommendation is properly made if it is both timely and specific. United States v. One Parcel of Real Property Known as 2121 East 30th St. , 73 F.3d 1057, 1059 (10th Cir. 1996). An…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- United States v. 2121 East 30th StreetCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Mayor of Balt. v. BP P. L.C.District Court, D. Maryland · 2019
- Rent-Rite Superkegs W., Ltd. v. World Bus. Lenders, LLC (In re Rent-Rite Superkegs W., Ltd.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado · 2019
- Alston v. Baltimore Gas & Electric CompanyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2023
- Continental Divide Collections v. OstrofskyDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2025
- District of Columbia v. Elevate Credit, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2021
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.