Legal Opinion

Waters v. Long Island Rail Road

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 29, 1966PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBernard S. Meyer, J.

In this nonjury action for personal injuries, defendant is awarded judgment dismissing the complaint at the end of the entire case. Plaintiff, Maureen Waters, was injured when she came in contact with the electrified third rail while crossing a part of defendant’s railroad tracks known as the Mitchell spur. Her action is based on the contentions that (1) the short cut she was using had become a public way and she was, therefore, a licensee entitled to warning which was not given, and (2) even if she be deemed a trespasser, defendant as the operator of the high-voltage third rail owed her a…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Byrne v. New York Central & Hudson River R. R.New York Court of Appeals · 1887
  2. Town of Leray v. New York Central RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
  3. Zambardi v. South Brooklyn Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1939
  4. Skzypek v. Long Island RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935
  5. Danna v. Staten Island Rapid Transit Railway Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Merriman v. BakerNew York Court of Appeals · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API