Legal Opinion

Danna v. Staten Island Rapid Transit Railway Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 22, 1937PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by an infant, and for expenses and loss of services by his father, judgment dismissing complaint reversed on the law and a new trial granted, costs to abide the event. We are of opinion that a railroad company may, by acquiescence in the long-continued use of its property to such an extent that a roadway or passageway exists, except as to the use of the length of the tracks themselves, obligate itself to assume the duty of exercising reasonable care to prevent injury by reason of its operation to those who traverse such roadway.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Beck v. . CarterNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  2. Byrne v. New York Central & Hudson River R. R.New York Court of Appeals · 1887
  3. Skzypek v. Long Island RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935
  4. Skzypek v. Long Island Rail Road CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1937

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Eugene O'COnnOr v. The Pennsylvania Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
  2. Carpino v. BakerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
  3. Sher v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1949
  4. Lederman v. New York City Transit AuthorityNew York Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Fischer v. New York Central RailroadNew York Supreme Court · 1947

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API