Skzypek v. Long Island Railroad
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtLazansky, P. J.
The complaint should not have been dismissed. (Lamphear v. N. Y. C. & H. R. R. R. Co., 194 N. Y. 172, where the facts are practically the same as those here presented.) In that case it appears deceased was struck by a train and killed while attempting to cross defendant’s tracks at a point where there was neither street nor highway, but only a footpath leading from one side to the other through openings in the fences. There was evidence of a constant public use of the path for many years, and defendant’s counsel conceded the fact. It was also shown that defendant had, at some time, put up…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Barry v. . N.Y.C. H.R.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1883
- Keller v. . Erie Railroad Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1905
- Lamphear v. . N.Y.C. H.R.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1909
3Cited by13 opinions
- Danna v. Staten Island Rapid Transit Railway Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
- Zoubra v. NEW YORK, NEW HAVEN AND HARTFORD R. CO.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1959
- Skzypek v. Long Island RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
- Lederman v. New York City Transit AuthorityNew York Supreme Court · 1962
- Jarvis v. Long Island Rail RoadNew York Supreme Court · 1965
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.