Legal Opinion

King v. Mitchell

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 1, 1949PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Action by Fay King against Murcell Mitchell and another, for loss of consortium of plaintiff's husband arising out of an automobile collision. The defendant Mitchell moved to be relieved from a default judgment.

The Circuit Court for Grant County, M.A. Biggs, J., made an order denying the motion, and movant appealed.

The Supreme Court, Lusk, C.J., held that movant was entitled to rely on the representation of his employer's personnel and safety director and the employer would defend the action, and that the court abused its discretion.

ORDER REVERSED, AND CAUSE REMANDED.

This is an appeal from an…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Carmichael v. CarmichaelOregon Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Hanthorn v. OliverOregon Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Eastman v. CraryOregon Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Hall v. McConeyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1910
  5. Mitchell v. CampbellOregon Supreme Court · 1887

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Busser v. NobleAppellate Court of Illinois · 1956
  2. St. Arnold v. Star Expansion IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Roberts v. PetersonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1987
  4. Walker v. CLYDE ET UXOregon Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Alery v. ALERY, JR., ET UX.Oregon Supreme Court · 1951

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API