Legal Opinion

Walker v. CLYDE ET UX

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 1, 1956PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLusk, J.

This is a motion to dismiss the appeal based on the ground that the order appealed from is not an appeal-able order.

The action was for recovery of personal property or its value. On June 17, 1954, judgment was entered for the plaintiff, the appellant here, in the sum of $1987.50 and costs and disbursements. On May 3,1955, the court, on motion of the defendants, the respondents here, supported by affidavits, vacated the judgment upon condition that certain expenses incurred by the appellant be paid by the respondents. It is from this order that the appeal has been taken.

The basis of the motion…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Deering v. QuiveyOregon Supreme Court · 1895
  2. King v. MitchellOregon Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Carmichael v. CarmichaelOregon Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Hanthorn v. OliverOregon Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Finch v. Pacific Reduction & Chemical Mfg. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1925

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Milton J. Wershow Co. v. McVeety MacHinery Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Colwell v. ChernabaeffOregon Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Mary Ebel Johnson, P.C. v. ElmoreCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  4. Union Oil Co. of Cal. v. Linn-Benton Distributing Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Bhattacharyya v. City of TigardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API