Legal Opinion
Pippin v. Burkhalter
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided June 10, 1981No. 21487PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Harwell, Justice:
South Carolina Federal Savings and Loan Association appeals from the verdict allowed against it on a purported claim arising under the Federal Flood Disaster Protection Act. South Carolina Federal contends that its motions for a directed verdict and judgment non obstante veredicto were erroneously denied. We agree and reverse.
The provision at issue, 42 U. S. C. A. § 4104a, and the applicable regulation formulated in conjunction with it, 12 C. F. R. § 523.29(h), provide that financing institutions supervised, approved, regulated or insured by the federal government must give…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Transamerica Mortgage Advisors, Inc. v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
3Cited by14 opinions
- Citizens for Lee County, Inc. v. Lee CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
- Lehmann v. ArnoldAppellate Court of Illinois · 1985
- Henry A. Bagelmann, Jr. And Mary Jo Bagelmann v. First National Bank and Iowa Bankers Mortgage CorporationSupreme Court of Iowa · 2012
- Guyton v. FM LENDING SERVICES, INC.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
- Highmark Federal Credit Union v. HunterSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.