Legal Opinion
Lehmann v. Arnold
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided October 7, 1985No. 4-84-0667PublishedCited by 44 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice McCULLOUGH
The plaintiffs, Mark and Julie Lehmann, brought this suit for damages caused by the periodic flooding of their home. Two counts were directed against Gene and Leslie Bateman, the developers of the subdivision in which the house lies. One count alleged a breach of an implied warranty of habitability, and the other asserted the Batemans had negligently failed to comply with section 13 of “An Act to revise the law in relation to recorders” (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1983, ch. 115, par. 13). The trial court granted the Batemans’ motion for summary judgment on both counts. The plaintiffs also brought a…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Kelsay v. Motorola, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1978
- Moorman Manufacturing Co. v. National Tank Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1982
- California v. Sierra ClubSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- United States v. NeustadtSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Zimmerman v. Northfield Real Estate, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1987
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,352 Martin A. Rankow v. First Chicago Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
- Tan v. BoykeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1987
- Harkala v. Wildwood Realty, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1990
- Henry A. Bagelmann, Jr. And Mary Jo Bagelmann v. First National Bank and Iowa Bankers Mortgage CorporationSupreme Court of Iowa · 2012
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.