Legal Opinion

California Novelties, Inc. v. Sokoloff

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 8, 1992No. G011260Published

[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]

1Opinion of the Court

6 Cal.App.4th 936 (1992)

7 Cal. Rptr.2d 795

CALIFORNIA NOVELTIES, INC., et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents,

v.

PAUL SOKOLOFF, Defendant and Appellant.

Docket No. G011260.

Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division Three.

May 8, 1992.

COUNSEL

Chase, Rotchford, Drukker & Bogust and Peter J. Searle for Defendant and Appellant.

Mary Gregory Biggs for Plaintiffs and Respondents.

[Opinion certified for partial publication.[*]]

OPINION

SONENSHINE, J.

Paul Sokoloff appeals from entry of default and default judgment in favor of California Novelties, Inc. (California Novelties) and Cindy Madsen Gray.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Greenup v. RodmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Becker v. S.P v. Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Devlin v. Kearny Mesa AMC/Jeep/Renault, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1984
  4. Uva v. EvansCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  5. JADE K. v. ViguriCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API