Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Gannon
Indiana Court of Appeals
From Shelby Superior Court; Pliny W. Bartholomew, Judge. Action by Michael Gannon against the Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago and St. Louis Railway Company. Prom a judgment for plaintiff, the defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtMoran, J.
The subject of controversy in this cause is a small tract of real estate, located on the outskirts, but within the corporate limits, of Greensburg, Indiana. On March 20, 1911, appellee filed a complaiht against appellant in two paragraphs, one for damages for the unlawful appropriation of this tract of real estate, and the other for *292possession of the same and for damages for unlawfully withholding the possession thereof. Upon issue being joined, a trial was had before a jury in the Shelby Superior Court, where the cause had been venued. Yerdiet was returned for. appellee, awarding damages in…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Dean v. Metropolitan Elevated Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1890
- White v. Cincinnati, Richmond & Muncie RailroadIndiana Court of Appeals · 1904
- Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. MacyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915
- Sykes v. BeckNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1903
- Painter v. HallIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Shikany v. Salt Creek Transp. Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1935
- Donner v. GriffithIndiana Court of Appeals · 1919