People v. Johnson
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Appeal by the defendant from an order of the County Court, Suffolk County (Ohlig, J.), dated March 8, 2004, which, pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C, designated him a level three sex offender.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The County Court’s determination to designate the defendant a level three sex offender in accordance with the risk assessment instrument was supported by clear and convincing evi*636dence. Thus, it should not be disturbed (see Correction Law § 168-n [3]; People v Baylor, 19 AD3d 467 [2005], lv denied 5 NY3d 710 [2005]; People v Masters,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People v. DaoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- People v. MastersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- People v. HamptonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- People v. WilliamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- People v. BaylorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- People v. MasonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- People v. MelendezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- People v. FrizaloneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007