Legal Opinion

People v. Hampton

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 30, 2002PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Marrus, J.), dated March 22, 2001, which, pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C, designated him a level three sex offender.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the Supreme Court’s determination designating him a level three sex offender was supported by clear and convincing evidence, and thus, should not be disturbed (see Correction Law § 168-n [3]; People v Wroten, 286 AD2d 189). Smith, J.P., Goldstein, Friedmann and McGinity, JJ., concur.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People v. WrotenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. People v. GuamanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  2. People v. DexterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  3. People v. RiosAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  4. People v. McGrawAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  5. People v. SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API