Lisenby v. Intermountain State Bank
Idaho Supreme Court
APPEAL from the District Court of the Third Judicial District,, for Ada County. Hon. Carl A. Davis, Judge. Action by a bank depositor to recover balance on deposit. Judgment for plaintiff. The law is so well established as to require no citation of authorities that the supreme court will not disturb the verdict of a jury where there is a substantial conflict in the testimony. (Hellebrant v. Kent, 29 Ida. 89, 157 Pac. 780; Jensen v. Bumgarner, 28 Ida. 706, 156 Pac. llé.^
1Opinion of the Court
BUDGE, :J.
This action was instituted by respondent against the appellant bank and its cashier jointly to recover the sum of $324.03 claimed to be the balance due and remaining «on deposit to her credit in the bank. The case was tried to the court and a jury and a verdict was returned in favor of respondent for the full amount claimed. This appeal is from the judgment entered on the verdict. Appellants have assigned several errors, but the only one discussed or relied upon for reversal is that the verdict is not supported by the evidence.
The material fact in dispute is whether respondent…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Davenport v. BurkeIdaho Supreme Court · 1917
- Consolidated Interstate-Callahan Mining Co. v. MortonIdaho Supreme Court · 1920
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. SnoderlyIdaho Supreme Court · 1940
- Black v. BlackIdaho Supreme Court · 1920
- Pickerd v. DahlIdaho Supreme Court · 1942
- Pleasant Valley Irrigation Co. v. LordIdaho Supreme Court · 1941
- Hansen v. Independent School District No. 1Idaho Supreme Court · 1939