In re Change of Name for A.C.S.
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MATTHEWS, Justice.
The question presented is whether the superior court properly denied a father's petition to change the surname of his preschool-age child to a hyphenated name containing both parents' surnames. We conclude that the court erred. We do so primarily because the court allocated to the father the burden of proving that the change was in the best interests of the child. Sinee this was an initial naming dispute, neither parent should have had a burden of proof.
I. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS
The son of Eric Gieser and Lisa Starling was born on May 12, 2002. Gieser and Starling were…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Burcina v. City of KetchikanAlaska Supreme Court · 1995
- In Re Marriage of PressonIllinois Supreme Court · 1984
- In re WillhiteOhio Supreme Court · 1999
- In Re Andrews by and Through AndrewsNebraska Supreme Court · 1990
- Drake v. WickwireAlaska Supreme Court · 1990
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In re Name Change of GoudreauSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2012
- In Re ACSAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
- PETIT VS. ADRIANZENNevada Supreme Court · 2017
- PETIT VS. ADRIANZENNevada Supreme Court · 2017