Legal Opinion

Quatray v. Wicker

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided July 7, 1933No. 31620PublishedCited by 60 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ó’NIELL, Chief Justice.

Dominick Quatray’s minor son, Austin Quatray, was hurt in a collision between a truck and an automobile. The truck was owned by Michel Wicker and was being driven by his minor son at the time of the accident. The automobile was owned by Harry F. Marchesseau, who was driving it at the time of the accident. Dominick .Quatray, for himself and for the use and benefit of his minor son, sued Michel Wicker and Harry F. Marchesseau for damages, alleging that both Wicker’s son and Marchesseau were guilty of negligence, and, therefore, that Wicker and Marchesseau were liable in…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Goldman v. Mitchell-Fletcher Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  2. Ellis v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Hobbs v. HurleySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1918
  4. Royan Indemnity Co. v. BeckerOhio Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Horrabin v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1924

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by60 opinions

  1. Northwest Airlines, Inc. v. Transport Workers UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Cole v. Celotex Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1992
  3. Minyard v. Curtis Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1967
  4. Harvey v. Travelers Insurance CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1964
  5. George's Radio, Inc. v. Capital Transit Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1942

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API