Legal Opinion
Chen-Oster v. Goldman, Sachs & Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided April 28, 2011No. 10 Civ. 6950 (LBS) (JCF)PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
JAMES C. FRANCIS IV, United States Magistrate Judge.
This is a putative class action in which the plaintiffs allege that their employer, Goldman, Sachs & Co. and The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (collectively, “Goldman Sachs”), has engaged in a pattern of gender discrimination against its female professional employees in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., and New York City Human Rights Law, N.Y.C. Admin. Code § 8-107 et seq. Goldman Sachs has moved to stay the action with respect to one representative plaintiff, Lisa Parisi, and…
2Cases cited55 opinions
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Volt Info. Sciences, Inc. v. Bd. of Trustees of Leland Stanford Jr. U.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Sharon Owen v. Bristol Care, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2013
- Vernon v. Qwest Communications International, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 2012
- Raniere v. Citigroup Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- Vernon v. Qwest Communications International, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 2013
- Ryan v. JPMorgan Chase & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2013
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.