United States v. Harris

OPINION OF THE COURT

Appellant contends that his enlistment was void, that the military judge failed to *670explain to him the terms of the plea agreement, and that the post-trial review was erroneously served on a substitute defense counsel. We do not agree and affirm.

Appellant pleaded guilty to aggravated assault, Article 128, Uniform Code of Military Justice (U.C.M.J.), 10 U.S.C. § 928, and was sentenced by court members to a bad-conduct discharge, confinement at hard labor for six months and forfeiture of all pay and allowances for six months.

I

On 31 March 1978, appellant received his…