Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Ex parte Crowley

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided December 13, 1920No. 1918PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Habeas Corpus. On petition by James D. Crowley for a writ of habeas corpus.

1Opinion of the Court

MORTON, District Judge.

[1] Habeas corpus to secure the discharge of the petitioner from custody under an extradition warrant *1017issued by the Governor of Massachusetts for his rendition to the state of Michigan. The case was heard on the petition, motion to dismiss, and answer. Such evidence was introduced as either party desired to offer. The petitioner has moved for a trial by jury; but, as the essential facts are not in dispute, I do not think the motion should be allowed; and it is denied.

The petitioner did business as a stockbroker under the name of J. D. Crowley & Co., or was a member of a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Strassheim v. DailySupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. Tiger v. Western Investment Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  3. Ex parte MontgomeryDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1917
  4. In re StortiU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1901

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Application of StrickerNevada Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Ex parte LayneDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API