Legal Opinion

Vijil v. Department of Workforce Services, Workforce Appeals Board

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided March 15, 2012No. 20110160-CAPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION

2Per curiam

{1 Daniel S. Vijil petitions for review of the decision of the Workforce Appeals Board (the Board) affirming the denial of unemployment benefits because Vijil was discharged for just cause. We decline to disturb the Board's decision.

$2 This court will reverse an administrative agency's findings of fact "only if the findings are not supported by substantial evidence." Drake v. Industrial Comm'n, 939 P.2d 177, 181 (Utah 1997). "Substantial evidence is that quantum and quality of relevant evidence that is adequate to convince a reasonable mind to support a conclusion." Smith v. Workforce…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Drake v. Industrial Commission of UtahUtah Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Questar Pipeline Co. v. Utah State Tax CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Smith v. Workforce Appeals Board, Department of Workforce ServicesCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2011
  4. Arrow Legal Solutions Group v. Department of Workforce ServicesCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2007

4Cited by1 opinion

  1. Vijil v. WFSVCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API