Legal Opinion

Arrow Legal Solutions Group v. Department of Workforce Services

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided January 11, 2007No. 20060102-CAPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

THORNE, Judge:

T1. Petitioner Arrow Legal Solutions Group, P.C. (Arrow) seeks judicial review of a decision by respondent Workforce Appeals Board of the Utah Department of Workforce Services (the Board) allowing respondent Sheryl Angle to collect unemployment insurance benefits under the Utah Employment Security Act (the Act). See Utah Code Ann. §§ 35A-4-101 to -508 (2005 and Supp.2006). Arrow argues that the Board abused its discretion in determining that Angle's separation from Arrow constituted a discharge rather than a voluntary quit without good cause. We reverse and remand for…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. West Jordan v. MorrisonUtah Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Burns v. BoydenUtah Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Adams v. Board of Review of Indus. Com'nCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1991
  4. Albertsons, Inc. v. Department of Employment SecurityCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1993
  5. Tasters Ltd. v. Department of Employment SecurityCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1991

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Wright v. Workforce Appeals BoardCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2011
  2. Vijil v. Department of Workforce Services, Workforce Appeals BoardCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2012
  3. Durbin v. Department of Workforce Services, Workforce Appeals BoardCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2013
  4. Fragomeno v. Department of Workforce ServicesCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2011
  5. Ivie v. DEPARTMENT OF WORKFORCE SERVICESCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2011

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API