Miller v. Commonwealth
Court of Appeals of Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
HODGES, Senior Judge.
Boyd Oliver Miller, Jr. (appellant) was convicted of two counts of robbery and two counts of use of a firearm in the commission of robbery. There was no controversy that the pistol he used in the robberies was so badly rusted that ammunition could not be loaded into it. Therefore, he contends that the pistol was not a firearm within the meaning of Code § 18.2-53.1 and thus, the evidence was insufficient to sustain his convictions for use of a firearm in the commission of robbery. We disagree and affirm the convictions.
I
Appellant was charged with two counts of robbery, two…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Yarborough v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1994
- Holloman v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1980
- Newton v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1995
- Cox v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1978
- Sprouse v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1995
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Startin v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2010
- Thomas v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1997
- Armstrong v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2001
- Startin v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2009
- Armstrong v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2001
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.