Legal Opinion

Startin v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Virginia

Decided September 8, 2009No. Record 2837-08-4PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLEO E. POWELL, Judge.

Duane Elmer Startin, Jr., appellant, appeals two convictions for use of a firearm during the commission of a felony, in violation of Code § 18.2-53.1. Appellant contends that the trial court erred in finding that the evidence was sufficient to prove that (1) the item appellant used during the commission of two robberies was a “firearm,” and (2) appellant used or attempted to use a firearm or displayed a firearm in a threatening manner. Finding no error, we affirm the trial court’s judgments and affirm appellant’s convictions.

I. BACKGROUND

On January 12, 2005, appellant…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Higginbotham v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1975
  2. Redman v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1997
  3. Brown v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1989
  4. Mounce v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1987
  5. Martin v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1992

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Startin v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2010
  2. Startin v. Com.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2011
  3. Brailey v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2009
  4. Startin v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2010
  5. Startin v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2009

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API