Startin v. Commonwealth
Court of Appeals of Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
CLEO E. POWELL, Judge.
Duane Elmer Startin, Jr., appellant, appeals two convictions for use of a firearm during the commission of a felony, in violation of Code § 18.2-53.1. Appellant contends that the trial court erred in finding that the evidence was sufficient to prove that (1) the item appellant used during the commission of two robberies was a “firearm,” and (2) appellant used or attempted to use a firearm or displayed a firearm in a threatening manner. Finding no error, we affirm the trial court’s judgments and affirm appellant’s convictions.
I. BACKGROUND
On January 12, 2005, appellant…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Higginbotham v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1975
- Redman v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1997
- Brown v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1989
- Mounce v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1987
- Martin v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1992
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Startin v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2010
- Startin v. Com.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2011
- Brailey v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2009
- Startin v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2010
- Startin v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2009
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.