Armstrong v. Commonwealth
Court of Appeals of Virginia
1Opinion
UPON A REHEARING EN BANC
AGEE, Judge.
Eric Wayne Armstrong, appellant, was convicted in a bench trial of possession of a firearm by a convicted felon, in violation of Code § 18.2-308.2.1 He contends the evidence was insufficient to prove that the object he possessed was a firearm because it was not “operable.”
In an unpublished opinion, a divided panel of this Court affirmed the conviction. Armstrong v. Commonwealth, No. 1388-99-3, 2000 WL 1724998 (Va.Ct.App. Nov. 21, 2000). However, we stayed the mandate of that decision and granted a rehearing en banc. Upon rehearing en banc, the stay of the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Juares v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1997
- Winston v. City of RichmondSupreme Court of Virginia · 1954
- Holloman v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1980
- Jones v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1993
- Jones v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1993
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Edwards v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2003
- Armstrong v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 2002
- Startin v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2010
- Rose v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2009
- Thomas v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2002
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.