Legal Opinion

Armstrong v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Virginia

Decided July 31, 2001No. 1388993PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion

UPON A REHEARING EN BANC

AGEE, Judge.

Eric Wayne Armstrong, appellant, was convicted in a bench trial of possession of a firearm by a convicted felon, in violation of Code § 18.2-308.2.1 He contends the evidence was insufficient to prove that the object he possessed was a firearm because it was not “operable.”

In an unpublished opinion, a divided panel of this Court affirmed the conviction. Armstrong v. Commonwealth, No. 1388-99-3, 2000 WL 1724998 (Va.Ct.App. Nov. 21, 2000). However, we stayed the mandate of that decision and granted a rehearing en banc. Upon rehearing en banc, the stay of the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Juares v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1997
  2. Winston v. City of RichmondSupreme Court of Virginia · 1954
  3. Holloman v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1980
  4. Jones v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1993
  5. Jones v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1993

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Edwards v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2003
  2. Armstrong v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 2002
  3. Startin v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2010
  4. Rose v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2009
  5. Thomas v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2002

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API