Legal Opinion
Employers Mutual Casualty Company v. Knipp Equipment Inc. ETAL
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided February 11, 2025No. 6:23-cv-01213Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS EMPLOYERS MUTUAL CASUALTY COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 23-CV-1213-EFM KNIPP EQUIPMENT INCORPORATED and BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF EDWARDS COUNTY, KANSAS, Defendants. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Before the Court is Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Employers Mutual Casualty Co. (“EMCASCO”)’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 39). EMCASCO—the insurer of Defendant Knipp Equipment, Inc. (“Knipp”)—asserts that summary judgment be granted in its favor because it has no duty to indemnify Knipp for the arbitration award entered against it and in…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adler v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- Mitchell v. City of MooreCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- Lifewise Master Funding v. TelebankCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
- Thom v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.