Legal Opinion
Huddleston v. Coyle
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Decided February 15, 1869No. 2007PublishedCited by 9 opinions
from the Seventh Judicial District Court, Parish of Pointe Coupee. Miller, J.
1Opinion of the Court
■Howe, J.
This action is instituted to recover from the defendant, the widow of B. R. Coyle, the amount of a noto alleged to have been executed as follows:
“ $1500. WilliamspORT, La., November 9,1861.
“ Six months after date we, or either of us, promise to pay to the order of Wright, & Allen, at the office of Wright & Allen, in New Orleans, fifteen hundred dollars, value received, with interest at eight per cent, per annum from maturity until paid, being for supplies furnished for the use of my plantation, and payable out of the first shipment of my cotton, which is hereby pledged to this amount.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Plicque v. LabrancheSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1836
- Robinson v. ArnetSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1840
3Cited by9 opinions
- Falgout v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1939
- Eschete v. KraemerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1961
- Leon v. CampagnaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1930
- Bank of Coushatta v. WimberlyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1925
- Behan v. BallardLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1884
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.