Legal Opinion

State v. Stegall

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 4, 2013No. Nos. 20120362, 20120365, 20120386PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARING, Justice.

[¶ 1] The State appeals the trial courts’ orders dismissing three separate criminal complaints of endangerment of a child against Alexis Stegall, Chelsea Hettieh, and Kimberlie Lamon (“Defendants”). We hold that the trial courts properly dismissed the criminal complaints against the Defendants by concluding the charge of endangerment of a child under N.D.C.C. § 19-03.1-22.2 does not apply to acts committed by the mother against an unborn child. We affirm the trial courts’ orders.

I

[¶ 2] This case arises out of three separate criminal cases and has been consolidated on appeal.…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Whitner v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
  2. Rodenburg v. Fargo-Moorhead Young Men's Christian Ass'nNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  3. State v. GrayOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  4. State v. AiwohiHawaii Supreme Court · 2005
  5. State v. LaibNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. DeForest v. N.D. Dep't of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Kuntz v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
  3. Brock v. PriceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
  4. State of West Virginia v. Stephanie Elaine LoukWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2016
  5. City of Fargo v. HoferNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API