Estes v. Millea
South Dakota Supreme Court
1ConcurrenceHenderson, Justice
This Court has cautioned against the excessive use of res judicata. Lewton v. McCauley, 460 N.W.2d 728 (S.D.1990) (Sabers, J., concurring specially); Bruntz v. Rutherford, 451 N.W.2d 290 (S.D.1990) (Sabers, J., concurring specially as joined by Chief Justice Miller). I also believe we should caution against the excessive use of collateral estoppel. Since each case is so fact determinative, I do agree with the end result in the present case. Here, we hold that Williams is collaterally estopped; this party, Williams, is barred from reasserting issues that were actually previously litigated and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Bank of Hoven v. RauschSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
- Lewton v. McCauleySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
- Dow v. NobleSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
- State v. McComseySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
- Bruntz v. RutherfordSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.