Legal Opinion

Chicago, R. I. & P. R. Co. v. Cleveland

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 3, 1916No. 7653PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error from District Court, Oklahoma County; Tom D. McKeown, Assigned Judge. Action by A. S. Cleveland and others against the Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Company and another. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

EDWARDS, C.

Por convenience, the parties will be referred -to as plaintiffs and defendants, according to their position in the lower court.

The plaintiffs commenced this action against the defendant the Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Company and V. P. Barrett, by filing their petition, and later their amended petition, in which, after formal and jurisdictional allegations, it is alleged, in substance: That on April 21, 1911, the defendant railway company, by A. B. Harding, its authorized agent, at Hobart, Okln., issued and delivered to defendant, V. p. Barrett, its bill of…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. The DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  2. Wedd v. GatesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1905
  3. Strange v. CrismonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  4. Weisbender v. School Dist. No. 6 of Caddo CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  5. Wichita Falls Compress v. W. L. MoodyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ellis v. PayneDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1921
  2. Katter v. RodgersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  3. Crawford v. HemmingwaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  4. Early-Foster Co. v. Tom B. Burnett & Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1920
  5. Commercial Union Assurance Co. v. Creek Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API