Legal Opinion
Suprex Corp. v. Lee Scientific, Inc.
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided January 21, 1987No. Civ. A. 86-198PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ZIEGLER, District Judge.
Plaintiff, a Pennsylvania corporation, seeks declaratory, injunctive and compensatory relief from a Utah corporation and a Utah university for their efforts in trying to enforce an allegedly invalid patent. According to the complaint, plaintiff sold a chromatograph apparatus to a third-party purchaser, who later was informed by defendant Lee Scientific, Inc. that the instrument was sold in violation of Lee Scientific’s patent. The complaint alleges claims for unfair competition, Sherman Act violations and tortious interference with contractual…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Shaffer v. HeitnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois FoundationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Zumbro, Inc. v. California Natural ProductsDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1994
- Pfizer Inc. v. Elan Pharmaceutical Research Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1993
- Mallinckrodt Medical, Inc. v. Sonus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 1998
- Erbamont Inc. v. Cetus Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1989
- Delano Farms Co. v. California Table Grape CommissionDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2009
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.