Legal Opinion

Dart Truck Co. v. United States

District Court, W.D. Missouri

Decided February 3, 1958No. 10393PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DUNCAN, Chief Judge.

This is an action to recover the sum of $79,915.41 together with interest, which the plaintiff alleges it was required to pay [under protest], as an excise tax on certain automotive accessories and parts, under § 3403(c) Revenue Act of 1939, 26 U.S.C. § 3403(c). The facts are not in dispute, and are before the court on stipulation.1

*305Briefly stated, the facts are: that the plaintiff is engaged in the assembling of two types of automotive equipment at a plant in Kansas City, Missouri, which may be described as “highway” and “off-the-highway” automotive equipment. *306The…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hecht v. MalleySupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  2. Hecht v. MalleySupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  3. Universal Battery Co. v. United States and Four Other CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  4. Universal Battery Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  5. Heiner v. BeattyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1927

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Pacific Car and Foundry Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
  2. Grant v. WhiteDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API