Dart Truck Co. v. United States
District Court, W.D. Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
DUNCAN, Chief Judge.
This is an action to recover the sum of $79,915.41 together with interest, which the plaintiff alleges it was required to pay [under protest], as an excise tax on certain automotive accessories and parts, under § 3403(c) Revenue Act of 1939, 26 U.S.C. § 3403(c). The facts are not in dispute, and are before the court on stipulation.1
*305Briefly stated, the facts are: that the plaintiff is engaged in the assembling of two types of automotive equipment at a plant in Kansas City, Missouri, which may be described as “highway” and “off-the-highway” automotive equipment. *306The…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hecht v. MalleySupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Hecht v. MalleySupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Universal Battery Co. v. United States and Four Other CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Universal Battery Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Heiner v. BeattyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1927
3Cited by2 opinions
- Pacific Car and Foundry Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
- Grant v. WhiteDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 1963