Legal Opinion

Pacific Car and Foundry Company v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 20, 1970No. 22903_1PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

J. WARREN MADDEN, Judge:

The plaintiff, Pacific Car and Foundry Company, hereinafter designated as “taxpayer”, brought this suit in the District Court to recover certain excise taxes which the United States had collected from it for the quarterly period January 1 through March 31, 1961. The District Court gave the taxpayer a judgment for the amount claimed by it, $3,813.47, plus interest. The United States has appealed from that judgment. The Jurisdiction of the District Court and that of this court are not questioned. The tax in question is the eight per cent excise tax imposed by section…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Universal Battery Co. v. United States and Four Other CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  2. Universal Battery Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  3. Irwin Aran, Doing Business as Auto Nurse Manufacturing Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1958
  4. Crown Products Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1965
  5. Dart Truck Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1958

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Fargo Foundry Steel & Manufacturing Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. North Dakota · 1976
  2. Thomasville Automotive Parts, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, M.D. Georgia · 1976
  3. Milton M. Morris, D/B/A Milmor Manufacturing Co., Cross-Appellee v. United States of America, Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1973
  4. Myers v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API