Legal Opinion

Heiner v. Beatty

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided February 23, 1927No. 3476PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOOLLEY, Circuit Judge.

The learned trial court so construed the will of Andrew Carnegie and so interpreted the applicable revenue act as to allow the executrix of John W. Beatty, one of the beneficiaries, to recover income taxes he had paid on moneys he had annually received from the executor and trustee under the will. The collector appealed.

Referring to the opinion of the trial court, reported in 10 F.(2d) 390, for an extended statement of facts and discussion of the law, we shall do little more than give the opposing positions of the parties and recite what we regard to be the pertinent…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Irwin v. GavitSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. Beatty v. HeinerDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1925

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. United States v. BolsterCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1928
  2. McDermott v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1945
  3. Dobbins v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1929
  4. Young v. GnichtelDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1928
  5. Riker v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API