Heiner v. Beatty
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
WOOLLEY, Circuit Judge.
The learned trial court so construed the will of Andrew Carnegie and so interpreted the applicable revenue act as to allow the executrix of John W. Beatty, one of the beneficiaries, to recover income taxes he had paid on moneys he had annually received from the executor and trustee under the will. The collector appealed.
Referring to the opinion of the trial court, reported in 10 F.(2d) 390, for an extended statement of facts and discussion of the law, we shall do little more than give the opposing positions of the parties and recite what we regard to be the pertinent…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Irwin v. GavitSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Beatty v. HeinerDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1925
3Cited by16 opinions
- United States v. BolsterCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1928
- McDermott v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1945
- Dobbins v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1929
- Young v. GnichtelDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1928
- Riker v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.