Legal Opinion

United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Newton

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 13, 1927No. 17752PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bell, ,T.

1. An individual may transad business either in his true name or in a trade name, and this rule is applicable to an administrator as to contracts which he is authorized to make. Hence, a purported contract of industrial insurance, made between one person as insurance carrier and the estate of a named person as employer, may be shown, by the surrounding circumstances, to have been intended as an agreement between the insurance carrier and the administrator of such estate, affecting the administrator in-his representative capacity; and in such a case, the agreement will not bo held…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Finley v. Southern Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
  2. Queen Insurance v. PetersCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1912
  3. Maryland Casualty Co. v. WellsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1926
  4. Farmers & Merchants Bank v. FarkasCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1921
  5. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. HallCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1927

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1929
  2. Cocke v. Bank of DawsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1935
  3. Cozart v. MobleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1931
  4. Morris v. Mutual Benefit Life Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1966
  5. Smith v. HedenbergSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API