Legal Opinion
Cozart v. Mobley
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided July 25, 1931No. 20866PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBell, J.
(After stating the foregoing facts.) At the outset 'it is proper to state that Washington Exchange Bank was incorporated by an act of the General Assembly passed in 1888 (Ga. L. 1888, p. 73), and section 8 of this act was as follows: “All the assets of the bank shall be liable for 'its debts, and each stockholder shall be individually liable for the debts of the corporation to the extent of his or her unpaid stock subscription, and in addition thereto each stockholder shall be individually liable for the debts of the bank *634equally and ratably, and not one for another, in an amount equal to the…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Richmond v. IronsSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Flash v. ConnSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Krueger v. MacDougaldSupreme Court of Georgia · 1918
- Matteson v. DentSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Clark v. ClarkSupreme Court of Georgia · 1928
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State Banking Company v. HintonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1933
- Carter v. DavisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1932
- Armstrong v. MertsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1948
- Pignatel v. MobleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1932
- CRIPPEN & LAWRENCE INVESTMENT CO., INC. v. a TRACT OF LAND BEING KNOWN AS 444 LEMON STREETSupreme Court of Georgia · 2020
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.