Legal Opinion

Seldon v. Suburban Mobility Authority for Regional Transportation

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided June 26, 2012No. Docket No. 295748PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDonofrio, P.J.

Defendant Suburban Mobility Authority for Regional Transportation (SMART) appeals as of right the trial court’s order denying in part its motion for summary disposition with respect to its claims of governmental immunity. Flaintiff cross-appeals the same order to the extent that the court granted summary disposition for defendant Queen Ferry and partially granted summary disposition for SMART. We hold that because SMART had no duty to secure plaintiff in her wheelchair or inform her of the availability of a shoulder restraint, the failure to inform plaintiff did not constitute the operation…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
  2. Maiden v. RozwoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Robinson v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Spiek v. Department of TransportationMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Walsh v. TaylorMichigan Court of Appeals · 2004

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Hunter v. SiscoMichigan Court of Appeals · 2013
  2. August Schutt v. SmartMichigan Court of Appeals · 2020
  3. Brad Thor v. Barrett H MooreMichigan Court of Appeals · 2018
  4. Brad Thor v. Barrett H MooreMichigan Court of Appeals · 2018
  5. Dana Mark Gamarra v. Oakland CountyMichigan Court of Appeals · 2026

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API