Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Von Gerzabek

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 11, 1923No. Crim. No. 1153PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTyler, P. J.

Petitioner seeks to be discharged from the custody of the sheriff of the city and county of San Francisco, by whom he is held under an order of the superior court adjudging him guilty of contempt in failing and refusing to' pay certain sums as alimony in a divorce proceeding.

The record shows that on the third day of April, 1922, the court below in the divorce action entered an order requiring petitioner to pay the sum of $50 on or before the fourteenth day of April, 1922, and a like sum on or before the seventh day of each and every month thereafter until the further order of the court as and…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Ex parte SpencerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Overend v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Frowley v. Superior Court of ModocCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
  4. In Re McCartyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Hutton v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Phillips v. Superior Court of Kern Cty.California Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Warner v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  3. In Re CarboniCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  4. In Re NyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  5. In Re CarpenterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API