Legal Opinion

Hutton v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided June 17, 1905No. S.F. No. 4094PublishedCited by 48 opinions

CERTIORARI to revise proceedings upon judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco punishing petitioner for contempt. Carroll Cook, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtAngellotti, J.

Certiorari to review certain proceedings culminating in a judgment adjudging petitioner guilty of contempt of court, and requiring him to pay a fine of one hundred dollars.

The contempt charged was the alleged willful violation by petitioner of the terms of a certain decree given in an action brought by one Jean Pon v. George W. Wittman, chief of police of the city and county of San Francisco et al., to which petitioner was not a party, whereby said Wittman, chief of police, and James T. Donovan, a sergeant of police, and “all police officers of the said city and county, . . . and all other…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Overend v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Rogers v. Superior Court of S.F.California Supreme Court · 1904

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Hotaling v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Oil Workers International Union v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  3. City of Vernon v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Frowley v. Superior Court of ModocCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
  5. In Re McCartyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API