Legal Opinion
United States v. Valentine
District Court, D. Wyoming
Decided June 2, 1994No. 93CV1005JPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON MOTION OF DEFENDANTS CONOCO PIPELINE COMPANY, EIGHTY-EIGHT OIL COMPANY, TRUE OIL COMPANY, PHILLIPS PETROLEUM COMPANY AND TEXACO REFINING AND MARKETING, INC. FOR LEAVE TO FILE CROSS CLAIMS AND THIRD PARTY COMPLAINTS
ALAN B. JOHNSON, Chief Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on the motion of defendants Conoco Pipeline Company, Eighty-Eight Oil Company, True Oil Company, Phillips Petroleum Company and Texaco Refining and Marketing Inc. (the “Settling Defendants”) for leave to file cross claims and third party complaints. A hearing was held on the motion on May 31, 1994. The Court,…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Cannon v. University of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Banco Nacional De Cuba v. SabbatinoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Texas Industries, Inc. v. Radcliff Materials, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Northwest Airlines, Inc. v. Transport Workers UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- United States v. Conservation Chemical Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1985
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Cox v. City of DallasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
- P.R. Fuels, Inc. v. Empire Gas Co.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1999
- United States v. Domestic Industries, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1999
- United States v. ValentineDistrict Court, D. Wyoming · 1995
- Davenport v. NeelyDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1998
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.