Legal Opinion
United States v. Valentine
District Court, D. Wyoming
Decided April 25, 1995No. 93-CV-1005-JPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED ORDER NUNC PRO TUNC ON MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
ALAN B. JOHNSON, Chief Judge.
The plaintiff’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment as to Liability and Days of Violation and defendant Jim’s Water Service’s Motion for Summary Judgment came before the Court for hearing October 18, 1994. Appearing at the hearing for the United States were Aleksander D. Radich, Sarah Himmelhoch and Michael Northridge; appearing for defendant Jim’s Water Service was Harlan W. Rasmussen. The Court, having considered the motions, the materials filed in support of the motions and in response thereto, the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Arizona v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Kehr Packages, Inc. v. Fidelcor, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Monsanto Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1988
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Hinds Investments, L.P. v. AngioliCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- United States v. Domestic Industries, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1999
- Amoco Oil Co. v. United States Environmental Protection AgencyDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1997
- Oil Re-Refining Co. v. Environmental Quality CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
- Substation K, Inc. v. Kansas City Power & Light CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 2020
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.