Legal Opinion

Cooey v. Strickland

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided April 21, 2009No. 2:04-cv-1156PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

GREGORY L. FROST, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court upon remand for consideration of whether the Court should continue a previously granted stay of execution to intervening plaintiff Kenneth Biros in light of Baze v. Rees, — U.S. —, 128 S.Ct. 1520, 170 L.Ed.2d 420 (2008). For the reasons that follow, this Court finds that Biros is not entitled to a continued stay and VACATES the stay of execution prohibiting the State of Ohio and any person acting on its behalf from implementing an order for the execution of Kenneth Biros.

I. Background

A. Procedural Background

The…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. University of Texas v. CamenischSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Baze v. ReesSupreme Court of the United States · 2008

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Jackson v. DanbergCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
  2. Cooey v. KasichDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2011
  3. State v. BroomOhio Court of Appeals · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API