Legal Opinion
Bruce D. Taylor v. Public Utilities Commission
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided May 12, 2016No. Docket PUC-15-89PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGorman, J.
[¶ 1] Bruce D. Taylor and Food & Water Watch appeal from a decision of the Public Utilities Commission conditionally approving the request of Fryeburg Water Company to execute an agreement with Nestle Waters North America Inc. providing for the lease of premises and purchase of water. 1 Taylor and Food & Water Watch challenge certain of the Commission’s procedural decisions, as well as the Commission’s ultimate approval of the agreement, on several grounds, including that the agreement exceeds the scope of Fryeburg Water Company’s charter authority, does not comply with certain statutory…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- S.D. Warren Co. v. Board of Environmental ProtectionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2005
- Central Maine Power Co. v. Maine Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
- Central Maine Power Company v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2014
- Maritime Energy v. Fund Insurance Review BoardSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2001
- Office of the Public Advocate v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2015
3Cited by7 opinions
- Office of the Public Advocate v. Public Utilities Commission et al.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2023
- Office of the Public Advocate v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2024
- Avangrid Networks, Inc. v. Secretary of StateSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2020
- Avangrid Networks, Inc. v. Secretary of StateSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2020
- Houlton Water Company v. Public Utilitites CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2016
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.