Legal Opinion
Klein v. State
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 30, 1992No. Claim No. 1; Claim No. 2PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In two claims to recover damages resulting from condemnations, (1) the claimants Kalman Klein and Estate of David Teicholz in Claim No. 1 appeal, on the ground of inadequacy, from a judgment of the Court of Claims (Silverman, J.), dated November 1, 1989, which, after a nonjury trial, awarded them the principal sum of $6,300, representing direct damages, and (2) the claimant Parkland Associates in Claim No. 2 appeals, on the ground of inadequacy, from a judgment of the same court, also dated November 1, 1989, which, after a nonjury trial, awarded it the principal sum of $1,890, representing…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Priestly v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1968
- Niagara Mohawk Power Corp. v. OlinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- In re County of RocklandAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
3Cited by6 opinions
- Chemical Corp. v. Town of East HamptonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- J.W. Mays, Inc. v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Madowitz v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Knickerbocker Development Corp. v. State of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- J.W. Mays, Inc. v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.