Legal Opinion
Madowitz v. State
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 26, 2001PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—In a claim to recover damages for the appropriation of real property, the defendant appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of a judgment of the Court of Claims (Silverman, J.), dated October 19, 2000, as, after a non-jury trial, awarded the claimant consequential damages in the principal sum of $154,950 for a taking of one portion of his property and a temporary easement over his remaining property.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
In October 1995 the State of New York took 5,063 square feet, or approximately 5.5% of the claimant’s property…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Town of Islip v. SikoraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- In re County of RocklandAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Estate of Dresner v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Klein v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- In re County of NassauAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
3Cited by4 opinions
- Kupiec v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- In re Village of Port ChesterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Transitown Plaza Associates v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Madowitz v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001