Legal Opinion

Posner v. Rosenbaum

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 6, 1934PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGlennon, J.

The plaintiff has appealed from a judgment dismissing his complaint on the pleadings and counsel’s opening. After the jury was impaneled, the defendant was permitted by the court to amend his answer by setting forth the Statute of Frauds as a defense, and, in addition thereto, to plead the illegality of the transaction upon which plaintiff’s claim was based. An application by the plaintiff, on the other hand, to amend his bill of particulars so as to indicate that the memorandum which was signed by the defendant, wherein he promised to pay plaintiff a certain amount alleged to be due,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Meyer v. PriceNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
  2. Seymour v. . WarrenNew York Court of Appeals · 1904
  3. Kleeman & Co. v. CollinsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1872
  4. Van Boskerck v. TorbertCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1911
  5. Jackson, ex rel. Hoogland v. VailNew York Supreme Court · 1831

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Capitol Bank & Trust Co. v. RichmanMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1985
  2. Olsen v. OlsenNew York Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Lynch v. SavareseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  4. In re the Estate of BernardNew York Surrogate's Court · 1941
  5. Taft v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API