Legal Opinion
Dynamis, Inc. v. Leepoxy Plastics, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Indiana
Decided January 8, 1993No. Civ. F 92-81PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
WILLIAM C. LEE, District Judge.
This matter is before the court on defendants’ motion for partial summary judgment. The parties have fully briefed the issues. For the following reasons, defendants’ motion will be granted.
Summary Judgment
Summary judgment is proper “if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.” Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(c). However, Rule 56(c) is not a requirement that the moving…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Edward R. POSEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SKYLINE CORPORATION, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
- Aro Manufacturing Co. v. Convertible Top Replacement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Mez Industries, Inc. v. Pacific National InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- R2 Medical Systems, Inc. v. Katecho, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1996
- Cybiotronics, Ltd. v. Golden Source Electronics, Ltd.District Court, C.D. California · 2001
- L.A. Gear, Inc. v. E.S. Originals, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 1994
- CVI/Beta Ventures, Inc. v. TURA LPDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1995
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.